The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful sports betting.

No, they weren't personally in attendance, however the world-famous celebrities were notably included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes casinos - the controversial websites providing both totally free casino-style games and lucrative prizes, such as cash, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'play for complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are just two cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of numerous video gaming corporations, not to discuss lawsuit plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments serve as standard casinos, only without the oversight, customer defenses and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the steep 24-percent federal gaming levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulatory obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits in 2015 alone. Now the business deals with allegations of unlawful gambling in a New york city claim that declares VGW utilizes celeb endorsers to 'produce a veneer of legitimacy' around its item. (See VGW's declaration listed below)

'I'm unsure" if you do not trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies operating multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a range of celebrities from gambling enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, along with NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom provide any differences between standard sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among many sweepstakes gambling establishments found online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to play at Chumba Casino, where numerous - however not all - video games are complimentary

Drake has an offer with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he routinely touts on social networks

Find out more

Donald Trump 'set to call NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements usually focus around the social aspect of the casinos, while omitting the potential for real gaming losses.

Others tempt customers with promises of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks ad displaying Drake's cars, planes and estates before rotating to video of the rap artist playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much cash?' check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption described: 'Because I never ever quit.'

The disparity in between gaming websites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit intricate, however operators of the latter insist they're not included with the previous.

A representative for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competitors with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, many of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are sports betting free.

'Most social sweeps consumers never ever make a purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of customers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller sized than the normal deposit or bet size at real-money online gaming websites.'

Social gambling establishments use customers a possibility to play casino-style games with good friends. Players have the alternative to purchase valueless currency frequently referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, however can be utilized to open different features within the video games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes gaming, permitting clients to acquire other currency called 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other rewards.

And therein lies the capacity for monetary losses, like the ones declared by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of money and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Global Poker occasion

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an ad showing off Drake's automobiles, airplanes and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are prohibited in all however 7 states, which has actually assisted to fuel the popularity of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which do not require normally require recognition. However, websites like Chumba will ask for IDs from gamers trying to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit customers to submit mail-in requests for complimentary sweeps coins, offered the players follow painfully particular guidelines. What's more, gamers are often rewarded with sweeps coins merely for registering, thus giving them a factor to try their hands at any number of gambling establishment video games for a possibility to win - or lose - genuine cash.

So why are sweepstakes websites permitted to run in 48 states, while online casinos are banned in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the totally free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is simply a method of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes games are just a kind of online home entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is required to play at social gambling establishments with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never need to spend for an opportunity to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is a crucial distinction between social sweeps and standard online gambling websites like casinos.'

Think about the way that McDonald's utilizes its yearly Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, however rather they're purchasing hamburgers and french fries that provide them the chance to win lucrative rewards, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the video game itself doesn't meet the definition of gambling in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring technique for promoting all kinds of everyday organizations in the United States, everything from burgers to publication subscriptions to coffee and home enhancement stores,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are routinely used by a who's who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to numerous gambling industry insiders, that argument does not cut it.

For beginners, gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald's Monopoly game doesn't run indefinitely. Rather, it has a distinct start and end, consequently recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real products like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last permanently and they're typically not connected to casino-style video games of possibility,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're simply cash giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] have none of the characteristics frequently related to McDonald's-style sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in all time, the sweepstakes gambling establishments provide" casino-like" payouts, typically 80 percent or more of earnings, whereas the typical payment percentage for a short-lived advertising sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the earnings earned by the company [generally less than one percent]'

Wallach is quick to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the web cafes that emerged in Florida, using customers the possibility to play casino-style video games for genuine prizes. A number of those brick-and-mortar establishments have actually given that been shuttered over claims of unlawful gaming.

DJ Khaled is amongst numerous star spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments ought to deal with similar scrutiny.

'These distinctions are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have consistently been cited by courts and state chief law officer as essential consider identifying that a sweepstakes promotion remained in truth a guise for unlawful gaming.'

Among the casino industry's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to examine sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact brand-new legislation on the issue.

'Consumers are being denied of defenses and states are forgoing considerable tax and profits opportunities as this gaming replaces that conducted through managed channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the plaintiffs who have actually sued social gambling establishments in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four separate cases in Kentucky without confessing any misbehavior, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, stating the settlement was made to avoid legal costs and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most recent suit, which is mainly comparable to its predecessors, New york city state residents Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'illegal sports betting enterprise. '

Apple and Google have actually likewise been called as accuseds in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company reacted to DailyMail.com's demand for comment.

'We generally do not discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson informed DailyMail.com through email. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has actually only simply been submitted with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

'We have full confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we operate, and stay confident about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to offer our free-to-play video games throughout the majority of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a years, producing not only terrific games, user experiences and entertainment, however also guaranteeing this is done securely, responsibly and at the greatest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd restate that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are fairly common throughout the online social video games industry (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we plan to intensely safeguard any claim which may be brought versus us.'

The issues between conventional online gambling and sweepstakes gambling establishments could show bothersome for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with standard video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that expert athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting 'sweeps' sites while at the very same time the leagues desire to project a strong position against unlawful gambling - specifically when trying to tamp down the occasional sports betting scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was simply 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time restriction from the NBA over accusations he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything involving social or sweepstakes casinos.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting presumably prohibited sports betting sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a major concern for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes sites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser added.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the gamers' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise overlooked to respond to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celeb endorsers have a responsibility to describe to consumers the differences and resemblances between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW firmly insisted there is absolutely nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have complete self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our company practices more broadly,' the representative said. 'A few of our worths are" our gamers precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes sites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who provide their names to shady illegal gambling websites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at risk in addition to courting civil and class actions by customers who allege harm,' Glaser said. 'There is likewise some threat that state regulators and state attorney generals of the United States rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for facilitating prohibited gambling.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton